Letter from police: 'H.P.D. not to blame'
Feb 19, 2009 | 513 views | 6 6 comments | 1 1 recommendations | email to a friend | print

In light of the recent discussions on cutting costs in Hoboken, some have suggested layoffs of police and firefighters. Our recent Hoboken cover story (see below) on the next chief also led to some comments and suggestions. Now, the local police officers' union president submitted a letter in response to some recent comments on various blogs and websites. Here it is.



Dear Editor:



Over the past several months there have been a number of individuals who have spoken out at council meetings and on web blogs demanding cuts in police union contract benefits, and lay-offs of police officers. These attacks have negatively affected the morale of all Hoboken police officers. This is no way to treat officers who are duty sworn to protect and serve the community and faced daily with the likelihood of being seriously injured or killed in the process.

I respect the right of free speech. However, anyone exercising this right has a moral obligation to ensure that the subject matter in which they speak of is thoroughly researched, factual, and not skewed to serve one’s own political agenda or personal ax to grind.

The National economic recession and recent tax increase affects all and I truly empathize with those individuals suffering. I understand those angered and frustrated with the city, but disagree with those feelings being directed at your police force. We are not the root cause of the city’s financial crisis.

Regarding our contracts both past and present, we have consistently made concession which saved the city millions of dollars over the past 30 years. In the late 1970s, when the city cried poverty the union’s settled contracts without pay raises.

A newly hired police officer’s salary is approximately $35,600.00 and officers are required to wait 13 years to reach a top pay of $86,900. In comparison with Bergen County, police officer’s top average salaries there exceed $100,000.

A recent New York Times article reported that persons living in the New York City metropolitan area (includes Hudson County) who earn an average salary of $123,000 annually are classified as middle class. That means that a Hoboken police officer at a top salary would fall well below the “middle class” socioeconomic classification.

At present our Table of Organization calls for 120 patrol officers. We have been consistently understaffed, the past 2 years, by an average of 20 officers. Not filling officer vacancies during that time saved the city in excess of $1.4 million. Just some of the many studies supporting the need for police officers:

· Each Police officer added to a department in a large city will prevent on average 24 serious crimes (i.e. murders, sexual assaults, robberies, aggravated assaults, burglaries, and auto thefts) study by Marvel & Moody (1996) – printed in American Society of Criminology.

· An increase in police leads to reduction in crime. “Jonathan Klick and Alex Tabarrock 2004 study.”

· Marginal increases in police officers leads to lower crime. Each additional police officer is estimated to eliminate eight to ten serious crimes. Existing estimates of costs of crime suggest that the social benefit of reduced crime is approximately $100k per officer per year. (Study by Steven Levitt - (2005).

President Obama’s economic stimulus plan includes 4 billion in local police hiring and service grants. We must encourage our elected State representatives to aggressively secure our share of this money to help pay for additional police in Hoboken.

We will continue to do our very best to protect and serve the community, although we feel, as of late, somewhat underappreciated by some.

Respectfully,

Vince Lombardi, President

Hoboken Policemen’s Benevolent Association


comments (6)
« Jeffst wrote on Thursday, Feb 19 at 03:33 PM »
It's time that the public workers in this state started paying attention to the greater good rather then their own. We are in a lot of trouble. Some of it can be solved by doing away with the feathering that occurs in our public payrolls with both the rank and file and management. We certainly have too many officers in the department and frankly we could do with fewer officers as well. This is also true in city hall. Hoboken is desperate for reform. The self serving letter from the PBA President is just another example of the "village" trying to protect its own at the expense of the taxpayer.
« Belwether wrote on Thursday, Feb 19 at 12:31 PM »
Hobokencares,

Not all the cops in Hoboken are corrupt like LaBruno and Andriani. I do not condone defacing the Police Department. They do a valiant, tough job.

My issues have been with the management to non management ratios, the pay scales at the management levels and the overall rich benefits package. Yes, the Police and all other departments could use new policies and procedures to help them deal with misuse and overspending of town funds, discipline to move out unethical employees.

Defacing the Police like this doesn't help in reforming how Hoboken and it's departments are managed.

Donna

« hobokencares wrote on Thursday, Feb 19 at 09:53 AM »
HPD is a Joke most of these Punk cops walk around like there gods and forget who pays there payroll, just look at all wasted time these cops stand in font of wallace school on willow ,and stand in middle of the street talking to woman that favor them and give everyone else a hard time to move. The same A holes cops on bikes , there is a nother lawsuit wasting to happen.. you will see.
« GaryGar wrote on Thursday, Feb 19 at 09:08 AM »
I think the police department is doing an excellent job and should not have their morale effected by some of the internet neer-do-wells on other message boards. Some of them will bash anyone without truly understanding the hard work and challenges of the job. If you want to know what the police do or why a certain salary is high, why not ASK?

I do not count Donna (below) as a neer-do-well because she is making suggestions and as far as I can see has tried to have a dialogue with the firefighters when she asked questions. There is nothing wrong with asking questions if you truly want answers and aren't assuming without having facts (as many people do on teh internet). However, some will make assumptions and bash for no reason.

Keep protecting us, guys, and know you are appreciated. But these are tough financial times and we'll be looking for ways to make constructive cuts. I respect that you reached out to us, and I thank you. Hopefully more people will reach out to you rather than making cheap barbs.
« VoiceOfReason wrote on Thursday, Feb 19 at 08:36 AM »
Vince- Please publish an analysis of your management structure instead of picking part of the facts to present an untrue and unfair picture of the benevolence of the HPD (no pun in intended.)

The facts don't support your view if you share with the readers the grossly inflated salary and benefit structures that are in place for all levels of Hoboken HPD. I am fully aware that patrolmen and women start their careers at lower pay and work their way up.

However, I am also FULLY aware that the management in HPD is GROSSLY overpaid. Just look at our police Chief's salary being $200K+ versus Ray Kelly's salary of about $190K. That's 1 square mile in Hoboken versus over 300 square miles in New York City. That's a few hundred staff versus more than 30K officers alone (not counting staff at all.)

If they can find qualified management at those levels of compensation, why are we paying someone so much more? Shouldn't it be a lot less? Isn't that a fair question to ask and to have a discussion about?

« Belwether wrote on Thursday, Feb 19 at 08:01 AM »
Thank you Vince for your letter. Please go back and look at the layoff examples and my letter to Tripodi and posts. The examples given, the statements made have never been about the patrolmen, i.e., the men and women on the street protecting us, the fine and courageous work that they do for the city. The criticism has always been about the management levels - how much they get paid, the number of them in relation to the number of patrolmen (or firefighters) on the street responding to calls and protecting people.

The cuts suggested were MANAGEMENT CUTS (Sergeant and above).

When you look at compensation and make comparisons you have to include the value of the benefits i.e., TOTAL COMPENSATION. You mention Bergen County. Ridgewood is one of the towns where municipal workers contribute to monthly healthcare premium payments. You also mentioned that in the 70's the Police and Fire worked without pay raises. It was, in fact, because Hoboken along with NYC almost declared bankruptcy, that Hoboken began to offer Terminal Pay and the ability to accrue vacation and comp time towards retirement. It was a way of deferring compensation. When Hoboken gentrified in the early 80s, salaries went up but the Police and Fire kept these lucrative benefits. So, Hoboken has the highest pay and the richest benefits which means they have the highest TOTAL COMPENSATION when you include benefits.

Savings should not be look at in relation to the most that we've ever spent. It should be look at in terms of what we need to run an efficient department. That is, we need a bottoms up approach v. skimming off the top.

I am sorry that the morale within the Police and Fire departments is down. I wish that the departments can empathize more with taxpayers. Contrary to what people may think not all, not most of the taxpayers in Hoboken make tons of money. The 'morale' of the taxpayer is way down. People are worried, moving out of their apartments to smaller places, moving home or moving in with more room mates. I can name many. We want to stay here too and I would hope that departments can empathize with citizens who love this town.

Truly with best regards,

Donna